Stochastic Processes
Financial Mathematics
The daily trading volume of financial derivatives exceeds $6 trillion. The entire industry is built on stochastic process mathematics: the Black-Scholes formula, martingale measures, the Ito integral. Understanding this mathematics opens doors to quantitative finance-one of the highest-paid applications of mathematics.
- **Quantitative Finance**-option pricing, Value at Risk (VaR), credit risk models-all built on stochastic processes
- **Crypto exchanges**-BTC/ETH options use Black-Scholes-style models adjusted for heavy tails
- **Insurance**-valuing long-term liabilities (pension funds, life insurance) via interest rate models (Vasicek, CIR)
Предварительные знания
The Black-Scholes Model
In 1973 Fischer Black, Myron Scholes, and Robert Merton solved the problem: how should an option be priced-the right (but not the obligation) to buy a stock in T days at price K? Their model assumes the stock price S(t) follows geometric Brownian motion: dS = μS dt + σS dB. The key insight was the **hedge argument**: by holding a portfolio of stock and option, all risk is eliminated and earn the risk-free rate.
**Black-Scholes model:** dS = μS dt + σS dB (stock price) **Black-Scholes PDE:** ∂V/∂t + (1/2)σ²S²∂²V/∂S² + rS∂V/∂S - rV = 0 **European Call formula:** C = S·N(d₁) - K·e^{-rT}·N(d₂) d₁ = (ln(S/K) + (r + σ²/2)T) / (σ√T) d₂ = d₁ - σ√T where r is the risk-free rate and N is the standard normal CDF.
The Black-Scholes PDE is a heat equation in financial variables. The substitution X = ln(S/K) converts it to classical diffusion. The boundary condition is the option payoff at expiry: V(S,T) = max(S-K, 0) for a call. This yields a closed-form formula-rare in financial mathematics.
| Parameter | Effect on Call price | Greek letter |
|---|---|---|
| S (stock price) | Increases | Δ (delta) = ∂C/∂S |
| σ (volatility) | Increases | ν (vega) = ∂C/∂σ |
| T (time to expiry) | Increases | Θ (theta) = -∂C/∂T |
| K (strike) | Decreases | (higher strike = cheaper option) |
| r (rate) | Increases (weakly) | ρ = ∂C/∂r |
The Black-Scholes formula gives the "fair price" of an option that reflects expectations about stock growth
The Black-Scholes price does not depend on the expected return μ. It is the hedging cost-the price of constructing a risk-free portfolio that replicates the option payoff
Two traders with different μ (bull and bear) will agree on the same option price as long as σ is the same. The formula is the arbitrage replication price, not a present-value of expected payoffs
In the Black-Scholes model, the parameter μ (expected stock return) does not appear in the option price formula. Why?
The Risk-Neutral Measure
The central idea of financial mathematics: the price of any derivative = discounted expectation of its payoff under the **risk-neutral measure** Q. This is not the real-world measure P (where the stock grows at rate μ) but an auxiliary measure under which all assets grow at the risk-free rate r. The change of measure P → Q is carried out via Girsanov's lemma.
**Risk-neutral measure Q:** There exists a measure Q equivalent to P such that: - Under Q: dS = rS dt + σS dB^Q (μ replaced by r) - Discounted price e^{-rt}S(t) is a martingale under Q - Price of derivative: V(0) = e^{-rT} E^Q[Payoff(S(T))] **Girsanov's lemma:** B^Q(t) = B(t) + ((μ-r)/σ)t is a BM under Q. dQ/dP = exp(-θ²T/2 - θB(T)), θ = (μ-r)/σ (market price of risk).
**Fundamental theorem of asset pricing:** A market is arbitrage-free if and only if a risk-neutral measure Q exists. A market is complete (every derivative is hedgeable) if and only if Q is unique. Black-Scholes is a complete market with a unique Q. Real markets (with jumps, stochastic volatility) are incomplete; Q is not unique.
| Measure | Drift of S(t) | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Real-world P | μ (stock return) | Describes the real world |
| Risk-neutral Q | r (risk-free rate) | Derivative pricing |
| T-forward measure | r (no drift for forward) | Pricing exotic products |
| Annuity measure | Swap rate as drift | Swap pricing |
The risk-neutral measure Q is the actual probability measure of the market
Q is an auxiliary mathematical measure for pricing. Under Q, assets grow at r, but the real world is described by P. Investors are not risk-neutral-this is a mathematical tool, not a behavioral assumption
Girsanov's lemma changes probabilities from P to Q. Under Q computations simplify (discounted assets are martingales), but Q ≠ real-world probabilities. The real stock drift μ ≠ r
Under the risk-neutral measure Q, a stock with μ=15%, r=5%, σ=20% evolves as:
Option Pricing
Beyond European calls and puts there are hundreds of option types. **Binary** options (pay $1 if S(T) > K), **barrier** options (knocked out when the barrier is crossed), **Asian** options (payoff based on average S)-for each type the risk-neutral approach gives a formula or pricing algorithm.
**Option types and pricing methods:** **European:** closed-form formula (Black-Scholes) **American:** no closed form; binomial trees or numerical PDE **Barrier:** conditional expectations; some have closed forms **Asian:** Monte Carlo or approximations (average is not lognormal) **Lookback:** depends on min/max of path; Monte Carlo General principle: V = e^{-rT} E^Q[Payoff(path)]
**Implied volatility:** Markets trade options at prices that correspond to different σ for different K and T-the "volatility smile/skew". This violates Black-Scholes assumptions (constant σ) and signals that real dynamics are more complex: there are jumps, stochastic volatility, and heavy tails.
| Option type | Payoff | Pricing method | Main use |
|---|---|---|---|
| European Call | max(S(T)-K, 0) | Black-Scholes closed form | Standard options |
| American Call | max(S-K,0) at any time | Binomial tree/PDE | US equities |
| Asian (average) | max(Avg(S)-K, 0) | Monte Carlo | Commodity markets |
| Lookback | max(max(S)-K, 0) | Monte Carlo/PDE | Exotic products |
| Barrier | Knocked out at barrier | Monte Carlo/analytic | FX, structured products |
Implied volatility is the real stock volatility that the market "knows"
Implied volatility is the σ at which the Black-Scholes formula matches the market price. It is not the real volatility but a measure of how much the market deviates from Black-Scholes assumptions
If Black-Scholes were perfectly correct, all options on the same underlying would have the same implied σ. The "smile" σ(K,T) shows how the real market deviates from the lognormal distribution
An Asian option is usually cheaper than a European option with the same parameters. Why?
Delta Hedging
An option seller has taken on the risk of paying max(S(T)-K, 0). How do they protect themselves? **Delta hedging**: hold Δ = ∂C/∂S shares for each option sold. When the stock moves, the share position offsets the change in option value. This continuous rebalancing is the source of the option seller's income-they collect the option's "time value".
**Delta hedging:** Δ = ∂C/∂S = N(d₁) (for a European Call) Portfolio: short 1 option + long Δ shares P&L = C(S+dS) - C(S) - Δ·dS ≈ 0 (first order) **Gamma** (Γ = ∂²C/∂S²): second derivative-measures how fast the hedge changes. **Hedging P&L** ≈ (Γ/2)(dS)² - Θ dt where Θ = -∂C/∂t (time decay).
**Delta hedging is a continuous process.** With discrete rebalancing, "hedging errors" accumulate-the quadratic variation of the error ≈ (Γ/2)·σ²S²·dt. This explains why option sellers profit through "gamma trading": they sell time value (theta) and hedge the delta, earning on gamma.
Hedging in practice: LTCM
Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM, 1994-1998) used sophisticated Black-Scholes-based hedging models, with Nobel laureates Merton and Scholes on the board. In 1998, Russia's default triggered correlations the models did not account for-"correlation in a crisis = 1". LTCM lost $4.6 billion and was bailed out by the Federal Reserve. The lesson: the model is correct under calm conditions, but fat tails and structural breaks violate Gaussian assumptions.
Perfect delta hedging eliminates all risk
Delta hedging eliminates first-order (linear) risk. Gamma risk (nonlinear), volatility risk (vega), and jump risk remain. Continuous hedging is only possible in theory
In the Black-Scholes world (continuous time, constant σ, no jumps) the delta hedge is exact. In practice: discrete rebalancing creates errors ~Γ·σ²S²dt; jumps cannot be hedged; market σ varies (volatility smile)
Delta of a European Call = N(d₁) ≈ 0.6. What does this mean for hedging?
Key Ideas
- **Black-Scholes model**-GBM for stock price; formula C = S·N(d₁) - Ke^{-rT}·N(d₂); price is independent of μ
- **Risk-neutral measure Q**-all assets grow at rate r; V = e^{-rT}E^Q[Payoff]; change of measure via Girsanov
- **Option pricing**-European: closed form; American/Asian/Barrier: Monte Carlo or PDE
- **Delta hedging**-hold Δ=N(d₁) shares; eliminates linear risk; gamma risk remains
Related Topics
Financial mathematics is the core application of stochastic processes:
- Brownian Motion and Ito Integral — GBM and Ito's formula are the foundation of the Black-Scholes derivation
- Martingales — The discounted price is a martingale under Q; optional stopping theorem = no-arbitrage
- MCMC and Sampling — Monte Carlo option pricing is a direct application of sampling methods
Вопросы для размышления
- Black-Scholes assumes constant volatility. The market shows a "smile": σ(K) is higher for out-of-the-money options. What does this reveal about the real distribution of S(T)?
- In 2008, asset correlations spiked dramatically. Why does this break delta-hedging assumptions?
- Delta of an at-the-money option is ≈ 0.5 when S = K. Why is 0.5 intuitively the right answer?